RACQ Motoring

Used Car Safety

used car safety

Take a few minutes to find out how the vehicle you are considering purchasing compares on the safety front. Those few minutes could save a life – your own, your passengers’ or that of another road user.

The Used Car Safety Ratings rate over 300 vehicle models which cover most of the popular vehicles in the Australian and New Zealand vehicle fleets manufactured from 1996 to 2011.

Ratings
About these ratings
Used car safety info

The tables below provide you with the crash safety rating for the driver. They show you how well each vehicle protects its driver from death or serious injury in a crash.

Download the PDF

Download the Used Car Safety Ratings 2012 brochure (PDF, 2.71MB)

Light Cars

Make Model Year Rating
Mazda 2 07-10 Excellent rating
Holden Barina XC 01-06 Marginal rating
Honda  Jazz / Fit 02-08 Marginal rating
Toyota Yaris 05-10 Marginal rating
Holden Barina TK 05-10 Poor rating
Mazda 2 02-07 Poor rating
Suzuki Swift 05-10 Poor rating
Daewoo Kalos 03-04 Very poor rating
Daewoo Matiz 99-04 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Charade 82-86 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Charade 88-92 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Charade 93-00 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Mira 90-96 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Sirion / Storia 98-04 Very poor rating
Ford Ka 99-02 Very poor rating
Ford  Festiva WD/WH/WF 94-01 Very poor rating
Ford / Mazda Festiva WA / 121 87-90 Very poor rating
Holden  Barina SB 95-00 Very poor rating
Holden / Suzuki Barina / Swift / Cultus 86-88 Very poor rating
Holden / Suzuki Barina / Swift / Cultus 89-99 Very poor rating
Honda City 83-86 Very poor rating
Hyundai Getz / TB 02-10 Very poor rating
Mazda 121 / Autozam Review 94-96 Very poor rating
Mazda 121 Metro / Demio 97-02 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Mirage / Colt 82-88 Very poor rating
Nissan Micra 95-97 Very poor rating
Subaru Sherpa / Fiori / 700 / Rex 89-92 Very poor rating
Suzuki Alto 85-00 Very poor rating
Suzuki Hatch / Alto 82-84 Very poor rating
Suzuki Ignis 00-02 Very poor rating
Suzuki Swift 82-85 Very poor rating
Toyota Echo 99-05 Very poor rating
Toyota Starlet 96-99 Very poor rating

Small Cars

Make Model Year Rating
Honda Civic 06-10 Excellent rating
Peugeot 307 01-09 Excellent rating
Volkswagen Golf / Bora 99-04 Excellent rating
Volkswagen Golf / Jetta 04-10 Excellent rating
Volvo S40/V40 97-04 Excellent rating
Ford Focus LR 02-05 Good rating
Ford Focus LS / LT 05-09 Good rating
Holden Astra AH 04-09 Good rating
Holden Viva JF 05-09 Good rating
Mazda 3 / Axela 03-09 Good rating
Peugeot 306 94-01 Good rating
Subaru Impreza 01-07 Good rating
Toyota Corolla 07-10 Good rating
Volkswagen Golf 95-98 Good rating
Ford / Mazda Laser / 323 99-03 Marginal rating
Holden Astra TR 96-98 Marginal rating
Holden Astra TS 98-06 Marginal rating
Honda Civic 01-05 Marginal rating
Mitsubishi Lancer CH 03-07 Marginal rating
Toyota Corolla 02-07 Marginal rating
Toyota Corolla / Allex 98-01 Marginal rating
Daewoo Nubira 97-03 Poor rating
Honda Civic 96-00 Poor rating
Honda Integra 90-92 Poor rating
Honda Integra 93-01 Poor rating
Hyundai Elantra 00-06 Poor rating
Kia Rio JB 05-10 Poor rating
Nissan Pulsar  00-05 Poor rating
Nissan Pulsar / Vector / Sentra 92-95 Poor rating
Suzuki Baleno / Cultus Crescent 95-02 Poor rating
Alfa Romeo GTV 82-84 Very poor rating
Daewoo 1.5i 94-95 Very poor rating
Daewoo Cielo 95-97 Very poor rating
Daewoo Lanos 97-03 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Applause 89-99 Very poor rating
Ford Laser 91-94 Very poor rating
Ford Laser 95-97 Very poor rating
Ford  Capri 89-94 Very poor rating
Ford / Mazda Laser / 323 / Familia 82-88 Very poor rating
Holden  Gemini 82-84 Very poor rating
Holden  Gemini RB 86-87 Very poor rating
Holden / Nissan Astra / Pulsar / Langley 84-86 Very poor rating
Holden / Nissan Astra / Pulsar / Vector / Sentra 88-90 Very poor rating
Honda Civic 92-95 Very poor rating
Honda Civic  82-83 Very poor rating
Honda Civic / Ballade / Shuttle 84-87 Very poor rating
Honda Civic / Shuttle 88-91 Very poor rating
Honda CRX 87-91 Very poor rating
Honda Integra 86-88 Very poor rating
Hyundai Accent 00-06 Very poor rating
Hyundai Coupe 96-00 Very poor rating
Hyundai Excel 86-90 Very poor rating
Hyundai Excel 90-94 Very poor rating
Hyundai Excel / Accent 95-00 Very poor rating
Hyundai Lantra  91-95 Very poor rating
Hyundai Lantra  96-00 Very poor rating
Hyundai S Coupe 90-96 Very poor rating
Kia Rio 00-05 Very poor rating
Mazda 323 / Familia / Lantis 90-93 Very poor rating
Mazda 323 / Familia / Lantis 95-98 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Cordia 83-87 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Lancer / Mirage CA 89-90 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Lancer / Mirage CB 91-92 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Lancer / Mirage CC 93-95 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Lancer / Mirage CE 96-03 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Lancer CE / CG / Cedia 02-03 Very poor rating
Nissan Exa  87-91 Very poor rating
Nissan Pulsar / Vector / Sentra 96-99 Very poor rating
Nissan  Exa  83-86 Very poor rating
Nissan  Gazelle / Silvia 84-86 Very poor rating
Nissan  NX/NX-R 91-96 Very poor rating
Proton Wira 95-96 Very poor rating
Subaru Impreza 93-00 Very poor rating
Toyota Corolla 82-84 Very poor rating
Toyota Corolla 86-88 Very poor rating
Toyota MR2 87-90 Very poor rating
Toyota Paseo / Cynos 91-99 Very poor rating
Toyota Tercel 83-88 Very poor rating
Toyota / Holden Corolla / Nova 89-93 Very poor rating
Toyota / Holden Corolla / Nova 94-97 Very poor rating
Volkswagen Golf 82-94 Very poor rating

Medium Cars

Make Model Year Rating
Audi A4 01-08 Excellent rating
BMW 3 Series E90/E91/E92/E93 05-10 Excellent rating
BMW 5 Series E39 96-03 Excellent rating
Honda Accord 03-07 Excellent rating
Mazda 6 02-07 Excellent rating
Mercedes Benz C-Class W203 00-07 Excellent rating
Saab 9000 86-97 Excellent rating
Saab 900/9-3 94-02 Excellent rating
Subaru Liberty / Legacy / Outback 03-09 Excellent rating
Volkswagen Passat 98-06 Excellent rating
Honda Accord 99-02 Excellent rating
Honda Prelude 97-02 Excellent rating
BMW 5 Series E34 89-95 Good rating
Ford Cougar 99-03 Good rating
Ford  Mondeo 95-01 Good rating
Honda Accord Euro 03-08 Good rating
Mercedes Benz C-Class W202 95-00 Good rating
Peugeot 505 82-93 Good rating
Subaru Liberty / Legacy / Outback 99-03 Good rating
BMW 3 Series E36 92-98 Marginal rating
BMW 3 Series E46 99-06 Marginal rating
Holden Vectra 97-03 Marginal rating
Honda Accord 91-93 Marginal rating
Honda Accord 94-98 Marginal rating
Mazda 626 98-02 Marginal rating
Nissan 200SX / Silvia 94-02 Marginal rating
Nissan  Bluebird 93-97 Marginal rating
Subaru Liberty / Legacy / Outback 94-98 Marginal rating
Toyota Celica 94-99 Marginal rating
Volvo 200 Series 82-93 Marginal rating
BMW 3 Series E30 82-91 Poor rating
Ford / Mazda Telstar / 626 / MX6 / Capella /
Cronos
92-97 Poor rating
Honda Accord 86-90 Poor rating
Honda Prelude 92-96 Poor rating
Subaru Liberty / Legacy 89-93 Poor rating
Daewoo Espero 95-97 Very poor rating
Daewoo Tacuma 00-04 Very poor rating
Ford / Mazda Telstar / 626 / MX6 / Capella 83-86 Very poor rating
Ford / Mazda Telstar / 626 / MX6 / Capella 88-91 Very poor rating
Holden  Camira 82-89 Very poor rating
Holden / Toyota Apollo JK/JL / Camry / Vista 88-92 Very poor rating
Holden / Toyota Apollo JM/JP / Camry / Sceptor 93-97 Very poor rating
Honda Accord 82-85 Very poor rating
Honda Prelude 83-91 Very poor rating
Mazda RX7 82-85 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Galant  95-96 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Sigma / Galant / Sapporo /
Lambda
82-84 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Starion 82-87 Very poor rating
Nissan  Bluebird 82-86 Very poor rating
Nissan  Pintara 86-88 Very poor rating
Nissan / Ford  Pintara / Corsair / Bluebird 89-92 Very poor rating
Subaru 1800 / Leone / Omega /
4WD Wagon
82-93 Very poor rating
Toyota Camry 83-86 Very poor rating
Toyota Celica 81-85 Very poor rating
Toyota Celica 86-89 Very poor rating
Toyota Celica 90-93 Very poor rating
Toyota Corona 82-88 Very poor rating

Large Cars

Make Model Year Rating
Ford Falcon FG 08-10 Excellent rating
Mercedes Benz E-Class W210 96-02 Excellent rating
Mitsubishi 380 05-08 Excellent rating
Toyota Aurion 06-10 Excellent rating
Ford Fairlane & LTD AU 99-02 Good rating
Ford Falcon BA/BF 02-08 Good rating
Holden Commodore VE 06-10 Good rating
Holden Commodore VY/VZ 02-07 Good rating
Holden Monaro 01-05 Good rating
Holden Statesman/Caprice WH 99-03 Good rating
Honda Legend 86-95 Good rating
Mercedes Benz E-Class W124 86-94 Good rating
Mitsubishi Magna TL/TW / Verada KL/KW 03-05 Good rating
Toyota Avalon 00-05 Good rating
Toyota Camry 02-06 Good rating
Toyota Camry 06-10 Good rating
Volvo 700/900 Series 84-92 Good rating
Ford Fairlane N & LTD D 88-94 Marginal rating
Ford Fairlane N & LTD D 95-98 Marginal rating
Ford Falcon AU 98-02 Marginal rating
Holden Commodore VT/VX 97-02 Marginal rating
Holden  Stateman/Caprice VR/VS 94-98 Marginal rating
Nissan Maxima / Cefiro 95-99 Marginal rating
Toyota Camry 98-02 Marginal rating
Toyota Cressida / Mark II 89-93 Marginal rating
Volvo 850/S70/V70/C70 92-99 Marginal rating
Ford Falcon EB Series II / Falcon ED 92-94 Poor rating
Ford  Falcon EF/EL 94-98 Poor rating
Holden / Toyota Commodore VR/VS / Lexcen 93-97 Poor rating
Hyundai Sonata 89-97 Poor rating
Mitsubishi Magna TE/TF/TH/TJ / Verada KE/KF/KH/KJ / Diamante 96-03 Poor rating
Mitsubishi Magna TR/TS / Verada KR/KS / V3000 / Diamante 91-96 Poor rating
Nissan Maxima 90-94 Poor rating
Ford Fairlane Z & LTD F 82-87 Very poor rating
Ford Falcon EA / Falcon EB Series I 88-92 Very poor rating
Ford  Falcon XE/XF 82-88 Very poor rating
Holden Statesman/Caprice WB 82-85 Very poor rating
Holden  Commodore VB-VL 82-88 Very poor rating
Holden / Toyota Commodore VN/VP / Lexcen 89-93 Very poor rating
Jaguar XJ6 82-86 Very poor rating
Mazda  929 / Luce 82-90 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Magna TM/TN/TP / Sigma / V3000 85-90 Very poor rating
Nissan  Skyline 83-88 Very poor rating
Toyota Crown / Cressida / Mark II 82-85 Very poor rating
Toyota Supra 82-90 Very poor rating

People Movers

Make Model Year Rating
Honda Odyssey 95-00 Excellent rating
Kia Carnival 99-06 Excellent rating
Toyota Tarago / Previa / Estima 00-06 Excellent rating
Toyota Tarago / Previa / Estima 91-99 Marginal rating
Mitsubishi Starwagon / Delica Spacegear 95-98 Poor rating
Mitsubishi Starwagon / Delica Spacegear 98-03 Poor rating
Mitsubishi Starwagon / Delica Starwagon 87-93 Very poor rating
Mitsubishi Starwagon / L300  83-86 Very poor rating
Toyota Tarago 83-89 Very poor rating

Commercial - Vans

Make Model Year Rating
Ford Transit 01-07 Excellent rating
Volkswagen Caravelle / Transporter 95-04 Excellent rating
Ford Transit 95-00 Good rating
Ford Falcon Panel Van 82-95 Marginal rating
Toyota Hiace/Liteace 96-04 Marginal rating
Daihatsu Handivan 82-90 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Handivan / Cuore 99-03 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Hi-Jet 82-90 Very poor rating
Holden Shuttle / WFR Van 82-87 Very poor rating
Holden / Suzuki Scurry / Carry 82-00 Very poor rating
Toyota Hiace/Liteace 82-86 Very poor rating
Toyota Hiace/Liteace 87-89 Very poor rating
Toyota Hiace/Liteace 90-95 Very poor rating

Commercial - Utes

Make Model Year Rating
Mitsubishi Triton ML / MN 06-10 Excellent rating
Ford Falcon Ute BA/BF 03-08 Excellent rating
Ford / Mazda Ranger / BT-50 06-10 Excellent rating
Mitsubishi Triton MK 96-06 Excellent rating
Nissan Navara 05-10 Excellent rating
Toyota Hilux 05-10 Excellent rating
Ford Falcon Ute AU 00-02 Good rating
Ford Ford F-Series 82-92 Good rating
Ford / Mazda Courier / Bravo / Bounty 03-06 Good rating
Ford / Mazda Courier / B-Series / Bounty 98-02 Good rating
Holden Commodore VY/VZ Ute 02-07 Good rating
Holden Rodeo  03-08 Good rating
Nissan Navara 97-05 Good rating
Toyota Hilux 03-04 Good rating
Ford Falcon Ute 96-99 Marginal rating
Holden Commodore VU Ute 00-02 Marginal rating
Holden Rodeo 96-98 Marginal rating
Holden Rodeo 99-02 Marginal rating
Toyota Hilux 98-02 Marginal rating
Holden Commodore Ute VR/VS 94-00 Poor rating
Nissan Navara 92-96 Poor rating
Ford / Nissan Falcon Ute / XFN Ute 82-95 Very poor rating
Holden Commodore Ute VG/VP 90-93 Very poor rating
Holden WB Series 82-85 Very poor rating
Holden / Isuzu Rodeo / Pickup 82-85 Very poor rating
Holden / Isuzu Rodeo / Pickup 89-95 Very poor rating
Kia Ceres 92-00 Very poor rating
Nissan  720 Ute 82-85 Very poor rating
Nissan  Navara 86-91 Very poor rating
Subaru Brumby 82-92 Very poor rating
Suzuki Mighty Boy 85-88 Very poor rating
Toyota 4Runner/Hilux 82-85 Very poor rating
Toyota 4Runner/Hilux 86-88 Very poor rating
Toyota 4Runner/Hilux 89-97 Very poor rating

Compact SUVs

Make Model Year Rating
Honda CR-V 02-06 Excellent rating
Subaru Forester 02-08 Excellent rating
Ford / Mazda Escape / Tribute 01-06 Good rating
Honda CR-V 97-01 Good rating
Kia Sportage 98-03 Good rating
Nissan X-Trail 01-07 Good rating
Subaru Forester 97-02 Good rating
Suzuki Grand Vitara 99-05 Good rating
Toyota RAV4 01-06 Good rating
Toyota RAV4 06-10 Good rating
Toyota RAV4 94-00 Poor rating
Daihatsu Feroza / Rocky 89-97 Very poor rating
Daihatsu Rocky / Rugger 85-98 Very poor rating
Holden / Suzuki Drover / Sierra / Samurai / SJ410 / SJ413 82-99 Very poor rating
Suzuki Vitara / Escudo 88-98 Very poor rating

Medium SUVs

Make Model Year Rating
Ford Territory SX/SY 04-10 Excellent rating
Holden Captiva CG 06-10 Excellent rating
Mitsubishi Pajero NM / NP / NS 00-06 Excellent rating
Nissan Pathfinder / Terrano / Regulus 95-05 Excellent rating
Toyota Landcruiser Prado 03-09 Excellent rating
Holden / Isuzu Jackaroo / Bighorn 92-97 Good rating
Nissan  Pathfinder / Terrano  88-94 Good rating
Toyota Kluger / Highlander 03-07 Good rating
Toyota Landcruiser Prado 96-03 Good rating
Holden / Isuzu Jackaroo / Bighorn 82-91 Marginal rating
Holden / Isuzu Jackaroo / Bighorn 98-02 Marginal rating
Jeep Cherokee XJ 96-00 Marginal rating
Mitsubishi Pajero 92-99 Marginal rating
Mitsubishi Pajero 82-90 Very poor rating

Large SUVs

Make Model Year Rating
BMW X5 01-08 Excellent rating
Ford Explorer 01-05 Excellent rating
Jeep Grand Cherokee WG 99-05 Excellent rating
Land Rover Discovery 91-02 Excellent rating
Nissan Patrol / Safari 98-10 Excellent rating
Land Rover Range Rover 82-94 Good rating
Nissan / Ford Patrol / Maverick / Safari 88-97 Good rating
Toyota Landcruiser 98-07 Good rating
Nissan  Patrol / Safari 82-87 Marginal rating
Toyota Landcruiser 90-97 Marginal rating
Ford Bronco 82-87 Very poor rating
Toyota Landcruiser 82-89 Very poor rating

Protecting you in a crash

If all vehicle safety features were equivalent to the safest model, the number of fatal and disabling crash injuries could be significantly reduced.

Safety features that may significantly reduce the risk of death or serious injury in the event of a crash include:

  • front, side, curtain and knee airbags
  • seat belts designed to work with airbags.
  • crumple zones
  • collapsible steering columns
  • reinforced door frames

Myths about vehicle safety

Myth: You can take more risks if you’ve got a vehicle with safety features – they will save you in a crash.

Fact: While safety features are more likely to increase your chances of surviving a crash, they don’t make you indestructible. Safety features won’t necessarily save you from death or serious injury, particularly at higher speeds or if you’re not wearing your seat belt.

Myth: A safe vehicle is more expensive.

Fact: Many reasonably priced vehicle models score very well in the safety ratings and better than some of the more expensive models.

Myth: Older vehicles tend to be bigger and heavier, and therefore safer.

Fact: Older vehicles have been shown from crash records to be less safe on average than newer vehicles, due to fewer safety features and less sophisticated design.

Features to assist avoiding a crash

An increasing number of vehicles are being equipped with safety features that help drivers avoid a crash and these should be considered when purchasing a used car. Some of these features are:

  • Automatic braking
  • Lane departure waring
  • Electronic Stability Control (ESC)
  • Traction Control
  • Anti-lock Brake System (ABS)
  • Brake Assist


In deciding between different vehicles, or different models of the same vehicle, always chose the one with more of these features.

Decade of Action of Road Safety

Most of us know someone who has been affected by a road crash, either by being injured themselves, or through suffering a bereavement or injury to a family member or friend.

Every day, around the world, 3,500 people leave home and never return because they have been suddenly, violently killed in a road crash.

The United Nations General Assembly has set the goal for the decade: "to stabilise and then reduce the forecast level of road traffic fatalities around the world" by 2020. Millions of deaths could be saved as a result. The United Nations' Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020 is our opportunity to make our communities and streets safer wherever we live.

You can support this campaign by selecting a safer used vehicle by following the recommendations in this brochure.

How these safety ratings are calculated

Records from over 5 million vehicles in police-reported road crashes in Australia and New Zealand between 1996 and 2010 were analysed by Monash University’s Accident Research Centre. The ratings were calculated using an internationally reviewed method and are influenced by the vehicle’s mass, the structural design of the body, and the safety features fitted to the vehicle, such as airbags and types of seat belts.

Each of the driver protection ratings in the 2012 update has been recalculated based on the most recent crash data available so they are not comparable with the ratings published in previous years. Models of vehicles that cause lower injuries to other road users with which they collide, including other drivers, pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists, as well as providing excellent protection for their own driver, are awarded the “Safe Pick” label.

The score for each individual model can be compared against the ratings for all other vehicles.

The driver protection ratings are about the risk of death or serious injury to the driver of the vehicle in the event of a crash. The ratings are not about the risk of being involved in the crash in the first place, which is generally determined by a range of factors including driver behaviour, vehicle condition and the road environment.

Question: Won’t certain kinds of vehicles score a good rating because of the types of people who drive them or where they are driven?

These factors were taken into account as much as possible when the data were analysed. The ratings were adjusted for factors such as driver gender and age, type of road user involved, speed limit at the crash location, number of vehicles involved, crash configuration, and year and location of crash.

What's the difference between these ratings and the new car safety ratings?

New car safety ratings (eg ANCAP) are determined by crash testing vehicles in a controlled laboratory setting while the used car safety ratings in this brochure are calculated using data from millions of police reports on actual crashes involving a range of drivers and all types of driving conditions. 

Occupants of heavier vehicles in real-world multi-vehicle crashes typically fare better than those in lighter vehicles.  This is why ANCAP crash test results should not be compared among vehicles with large weight differences.  In many single-vehicle crashes, greater weight offers no safety advantage.  ANCAP crash test ratings relate to both occupant protection and the ability of the car to avoid a crash.  ANCAP has a separate rating for a vehicle’s ability to protect a pedestrian in a crash. 

The used car safety ratings listed in this brochure can be compared across all categories as they are derived from reports of actual on-road crashes and represent the ability of the car to protect its driver. 

The ‘Safe Pick’ vehicles further identify vehicles that provide the best protection for both their own occupants and other road users in a crash.

Any vehicle safety rating system can only provide an indication of the relative levels of protection between vehicles you can expect in the event of a crash.  Whether or not you die or are seriously injured in a crash also depends on how safely you drive your vehicle.

20 years of ratings

It is increasingly obvious from these Used Car Safety Ratings that, on average, newer models provide their drivers with better protection from injury in a crash.


This year marks 20 years since these ratings were first produced. Vehicle technology, build quality and safety design have all progressed enormously over that period. Features such as Electronic Stability Control, at least six airbags, and pre-tensioning seat belts are now almost universal in newer vehicles.

It is increasingly obvious from these Used Car Safety Ratings that, on average, newer models provide their drivers with better protection from injury in a crash. These improvements come from better structural designs, an increase in the fitting of safety features such as front, side, curtain and knee airbags, more advanced seat belt systems and vehicle interiors built with more energy-absorbing materials.

Another consistent trend is that there is significant variation within vehicle categories, even between vehicle models of the same age. Furthermore, some vehicle models, including recent ones, provide good protection for their drivers but present a high risk of injury to other road users in a crash. The Used Car Safety Ratings assist buyers to select vehicle models that provide the best protection for all road users including themselves.

These ratings are based on available data up until 2010. Later crashes have not been included. Occupant protection in smaller vehicles has improved significantly in recent years. Buyers considering a late model vehicle, particularly in the light and small categories, that is not listed in this brochure should check the ANCAP rating and aim at a 5 star performance – see www.ancap.com.au.

Where to find out more

  • RACQ Technical Advisory Service
    Phone: 07 3666 9148 or 1800 623 456
    www.racq.com
  • Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads
    Phone: 07 3114 5844
    www.tmr.qld.gov.au